There is no single answer. However, the past fifty years have seen a dramatic, undeniable shift in the moral zeitgeist. The old view—that animals are mere automata, incapable of pain or interest in their own lives—has been scientifically and philosophically defeated. The debate is now about the quality and duration of the lives we allow them to have.
Are you interested in a review of in a particular country, or perhaps an overview of cruelty-free brands ? There is no single answer
Despite their philosophical chasm, the welfare and rights movements share more foundational beliefs than either might admit. The debate is now about the quality and
Proponents of animal rights, such as philosopher Tom Regan, argue that animals have "inherent value" independent of their usefulness to humans. Consequently, the rights approach rejects the commodification of animals entirely. This creates a fundamental conflict with welfare: Proponents of animal rights, such as philosopher Tom
Other Journals