A distinctive feature of the book is its structured treatment of legal presumptions (e.g., against retrospectivity, against ousting of jurisdiction, against taking away property without compensation). Singh shows these as interpretive defaults that can be rebutted by clear contrary language, thereby respecting parliamentary supremacy while protecting fundamental legal values.
No study of GP Singh is complete without his exhaustive list of judicial presumptions: principles of statutory interpretation gp singh high quality
This article explores the foundational principles of statutory interpretation as articulated in Justice G.P. Singh’s seminal work, Principles of Statutory Interpretation . This text is widely regarded as the "bible" for legal practitioners and judges in India and other common law jurisdictions. A distinctive feature of the book is its
While literalism is the starting point, G.P. Singh highlights the as a necessary safety valve. This rule allows a court to depart from the literal meaning if it leads to an absurdity, injustice, or contradiction that the legislature could not have intended. Singh highlights the as a necessary safety valve
A distinctive feature of the book is its structured treatment of legal presumptions (e.g., against retrospectivity, against ousting of jurisdiction, against taking away property without compensation). Singh shows these as interpretive defaults that can be rebutted by clear contrary language, thereby respecting parliamentary supremacy while protecting fundamental legal values.
No study of GP Singh is complete without his exhaustive list of judicial presumptions:
This article explores the foundational principles of statutory interpretation as articulated in Justice G.P. Singh’s seminal work, Principles of Statutory Interpretation . This text is widely regarded as the "bible" for legal practitioners and judges in India and other common law jurisdictions.
While literalism is the starting point, G.P. Singh highlights the as a necessary safety valve. This rule allows a court to depart from the literal meaning if it leads to an absurdity, injustice, or contradiction that the legislature could not have intended.